R. v. Powley

Home » Case Law » R. v. Powley
  1. Case Title & Citation
    R. v. Powley, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 207, Supreme Court of Canada.

  2. Decision Summary (Neutral Overview)
    This case concerned whether two Métis hunters in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, had a constitutionally protected right to hunt moose for food without a provincial licence. They were charged under Ontario’s Game and Fish Act.

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled:

  • The Métis are a distinct Aboriginal people recognized under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

  • A Métis community existed in the Sault Ste. Marie area with its own pre-contact continuity and practices.

  • The accused were members of that rights-bearing community.

  • Their hunting fell within a protected “Aboriginal right” as Métis.

The charges were dismissed, and the Court articulated the now-standard “Powley test” for Métis rights.

  1. Historical & Legal Context
    After 1982, courts had to clarify who counted as “Aboriginal peoples of Canada” and how rights would be recognized. Prior decisions focused mostly on First Nations and Inuit. Métis people had often been treated as culturally Indigenous but legally invisible.

Powley was the first major Supreme Court decision to affirm Métis rights under s. 35 and to construct a framework for identifying Métis communities and rights.

  1. Key Legal Principles Identified in the Case

  • Recognition of Métis as distinct Aboriginal people under s. 35.

  • A fact-based test for identifying a rights-bearing Métis community.

  • Emphasis on historical continuity between pre-control practices and modern practices.

  • Rights are community-based, not purely individual.

  1. Implications for Haldimand, Loyalist, and Mohawk Questions

  • Powley shows that courts can build a specific rights framework for a historically rooted group (Métis of Sault Ste. Marie).

  • By analogy, a similarly careful framework could be crafted for Mohawk Loyalist posterity on the Haldimand Tract.

  • It supports the idea that not all Indigenous or colonially affected peoples are treated generically; law can recognize distinct communities tied to distinct instruments like Haldimand and Dorchester.

  1. Points of Interest to Mohawk of Grand River Posterity

  • Powley undermines the notion that Canada must treat all Indigenous interests as one undifferentiated “Aboriginal rights” category.

  • If Métis can be recognized as a rights-bearing community with tailored tests, the same logic invites a recognition framework for:

    • Mohawk Loyalist families,

    • Tied to specific Crown promises (Haldimand, Dorchester, Simcoe),

    • On a defined territory (Grand River, six miles deep).

  1. Unresolved Questions / Future Research Directions

  • How might a “Powley-style” test look if applied to Mohawk Loyalist posterity rather than Métis communities?

  • Could courts recognize a Haldimand-specific rights-bearing group with its own test (bloodline, Loyalist service, Mohawk national identity, etc.)?

  • How do Powley’s principles intersect with quasi-international instruments like Haldimand, rather than purely “Aboriginal rights” claims?

  1. Sources

  • R. v. Powley, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 207.

  • Constitution Act, 1982, s. 35.

  • Secondary scholarship on Métis rights and the Powley test.

438 words

Sign up to the Newsletter!
Get the latest articles and news delivered to your mailbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories


About Benjamin Doolittle U.E.

listen to BLOODLINE

“Bloodline” follows the Haldimand Proclamation from its original promise to the present fight to have it honoured. The track moves through Crown grants, broken commitments, and the legal and political road back to enforcement, asking listeners to hear the Proclamation not as a relic of the past, but as a living obligation that still binds the Crown to the Mohawk Nation of Grand River.

Artist: One Way Current
Writer: Benjamin Doolittle UE
Producer: One Way Current
Publisher: Corn Press Publications
Affiliation: Six Miles Deep / Mohawk Nation of Grand River

WHITE PAPER

CROWN PLUS

Crown Plus is an initiative of the Mohawk University, dedicated to restoring truth, lawful continuity, and honour in the interpretation and application of the Haldimand Proclamation of 1784 — the foundational covenant between the Mohawk Nation and the British Crown.

This paper is divided into three parts, each exploring a distinct dimension of the Haldimand covenant: its legal origins, its modern violations, and the path toward lawful restoration. Together, they form the living record of a truth that has been long buried beneath colonial misinterpretation.Crown Plus stands for the principle that the Mohawk Nation is not a subject of the Crown, but a co-sovereign pillar upon which the Canadian state itself rests.

The phrase “Crown Plus” reclaims the language of Canada’s political history — a response to the White Paper (1969) and Red Paper (1970) — and reframes it in the Mohawk context. Where others spoke of “citizens plus,” we assert “Crown Plus”: the indivisible bond of alliance, honour, and hereditary right between the Mohawk and the Crown.

Part I — The Legal Foundations and Historical Continuity

Explores the origins of the Haldimand Proclamation, the Dorchester correction, the Mohawk–Crown alliance since Queen Anne, and the constitutional distinctiveness of the Mohawk Loyalist posterity.

Part II — Modern Violations, Fiduciary Duties, and Institutional Responsibility

Documents the breach of fiduciary duty by Crown agents, the propagation of false land acknowledgements, and the complicity of academic, corporate, and judicial institutions in sustaining unlawful occupation.

Part III — Framework for Restoration, Recommendations, and the Path Forward

Outlines a ten-year restoration plan, proposes the Mohawk Posterity Registry and Royal Commission of Continuity, and reaffirms the spiritual and legal covenant through the Crown Plus Initiative.