THE FORGOTTEN COVENANT: Why Canada’s Legitimacy Still Rests on Mohawk Land

Home » News » THE FORGOTTEN COVENANT: Why Canada’s Legitimacy Still Rests on Mohawk Land
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…

In 1784, the Crown granted the Grand River lands “for the use of the Mohawk Nation and their posterity forever.”

That covenant, confirmed by Canada in 1791, remains the constitutional foundation of this country.

The problem is—Canada forgot it.

When Governor Frederick Haldimand issued his Proclamation on October 25, 1784, he kept a wartime promise.

The Mohawk Nation, loyal allies of the Crown during the American Revolution, had lost their New York homelands.

To restore them “to the same state as before hostilities,” the Crown substituted lands along the Grand River “for the use of the Mohawk Nation and their posterity forever.”

When Canada confirmed that Proclamation on December 24, 1791, it accepted more than a gift of land—it accepted a constitutional obligation. In that moment, the Mohawk Nation and the Crown became the twin pillars of Canada’s legitimacy.

Remove either pillar, and the structure of the state loses its lawful footing.

A Misnamed Treaty
Modern institutions often describe the Haldimand Proclamation as a “treaty” with the Six Nations. It was not.

The Proclamation explicitly names the Mohawk Nation, inviting only that “such others of the Six Nations as may wish to settle among them” could join. In Wilkes v. Jackson—an 18th-century case involving the same instrument—the court confirmed that this phrase did not create a collective body politic. The rights were hereditary and individual, not collective. Hereditary Rights, Not a Band or a Clan The heirs named in the Haldimand covenant are not a political band, not even a single community. They are the posterity of the Mohawk Loyalists—families who stood with the Crown. Two and a half centuries later, those descendants are diverse and global. Some live on the Grand River; others might live unknowingly in London, Beijing, or Nairobi.

READ MORE ON THIS SERIES!  An Overview of Legal Duty, Standing, and Enforcement Under the Haldimand Proclamation

Their rights are hereditary, not ethnic. Because the covenant is a royal legal instrument, its beneficiaries are defined by lineal proof, not by clan systems or Indian Act registration. The Haldimand document was drafted under European legal logic—akin to a lettre patente—and created a distinct class of Loyalist Mohawk posterity
whose entitlement is juridical, not administrative.

That means the Six Nations Band Council, or any list created under the Indian Act, cannot lawfully claim “exclusive use and enjoyment” under the Proclamation. It lacks completeness; it cannot represent every heir. To treat it as the rights-holder is to disenfranchise the many descendants—wherever they now live—who carry that lawful inheritance.

Dorchester’s Correction

Recognizing the flaw in the Proclamation, Lord Dorchester in 1789 established a formal system to verify Loyalist descent: those who could prove lineage were entitled to append “U.E.” (Unity of Empire) to their names.

This was the Crown’s administrative solution to the “fatal flaw” of unnamed beneficiaries. The United Empire Loyalist Association of Canada (UELAC) continues that role today. It remains the Crown’s only lawful process for verifying hereditary descent and confirming who the “posterity” are. No band list, registry, or collective claim can override that original verification.

1924: The Year of Erasure

In 1924, Ottawa amended the Indian Act, abolished hereditary councils, and installed an Indian Act Band Council at Six Nations.

RCMP officers raided the council house, seized wampum belts, genealogical records, and meeting minutes—the physical proof of descent—and declared the traditional government “dissolved.” That act replaced lineage with registration, and heritage with administration. Roughly 300 Mohawk Loyalists petitioned the Governor General that same year, invoking their rights as Haldimand posterity. The Crown acknowledged their standing, but Ottawa buried the implications. Since then, the covenant has been treated as a relic rather than the constitutional cornerstone that it is.

READ MORE ON THIS SERIES!  POSTERITY FOREVER: The Loyalist Mohawk Title Canada Forgot

The National Shadow

Canada’s political psyche carries a shadow: its denial of the covenant that made it legitimate. Every land acknowledgement, every reconciliation pledge, is haunted by the omission of the words “Mohawk Nation and their posterity.”

Universities repeat the misstatement that the Haldimand Proclamation was a treaty to “Six Nations,” perpetuating historical inaccuracy and legal confusion. Municipalities tax property that legally belongs to Mohawk posterity. Even Canadian citizens, by swearing allegiance to the Crown, are bound to uphold a constitutional order that includes this covenant—but most have never been told.

The Law Remembers

Under Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act (1982), any law inconsistent with the Constitution is void. The Manitoba Language Reference confirmed that unconstitutional frameworks may function only under temporary necessity, not legitimacy. By that logic, any title, permit, or public work on the Haldimand Tract issued without Mohawk consent is constitutionally defective.

Recent cases on fee-simple defects and unjust enrichment reaffirm this principle: no downstream purchaser can “cure” a defective root of title. When the defect is constitutional, the only cure is consent—or restitution.

Restoration, Not Rebellion

Restoration is not removal—it’s legality. It means reinstating Dorchester’s verification process, recognizing the exclusive use and enjoyment of verified Mohawk posterity, and converting occupation into leasehold, compensation, or consent-based tenure.

Universities, corporations, and municipalities can remain, but lawfully—under the covenant they stand upon.

To restore the Haldimand Covenant is not to undo Canada. It is to restore the balance that made Canada possible.

Closing Reflection

Inside the community, the word “Loyalist” still carries stigma. Outside it, the covenant is forgotten. Yet Queen Anne’s communion set, Queen Elizabeth II’s 2010 silver bells, and the enduring “U.E.” designation all testify to a 300-year alliance still in effect.

READ MORE ON THIS SERIES!  THE LOST INSTITUTE: How the Mohawk Hereditary Right Was Replaced by a Manufactured ‘Six Nations’ Narrative

To deny that covenant is to deny the honour of the Crown itself. To restore it is to fulfill Canada’s first and most sacred constitutional duty.

Loyal then. Loyal now. Loyal forever. The honour of the Crown still rests on the river it promised to the Mohawk Nation and their posterity forever.

933 words

Sign up to the Newsletter!
Get the latest articles and news delivered to your mailbox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories


About Benjamin Doolittle U.E.

listen to BLOODLINE

“Bloodline” follows the Haldimand Proclamation from its original promise to the present fight to have it honoured. The track moves through Crown grants, broken commitments, and the legal and political road back to enforcement, asking listeners to hear the Proclamation not as a relic of the past, but as a living obligation that still binds the Crown to the Mohawk Nation of Grand River.

Artist: One Way Current
Writer: Benjamin Doolittle UE
Producer: One Way Current
Publisher: Corn Press Publications
Affiliation: Six Miles Deep / Mohawk Nation of Grand River

WHITE PAPER

CROWN PLUS

Crown Plus is an initiative of the Mohawk University, dedicated to restoring truth, lawful continuity, and honour in the interpretation and application of the Haldimand Proclamation of 1784 — the foundational covenant between the Mohawk Nation and the British Crown.

This paper is divided into three parts, each exploring a distinct dimension of the Haldimand covenant: its legal origins, its modern violations, and the path toward lawful restoration. Together, they form the living record of a truth that has been long buried beneath colonial misinterpretation.Crown Plus stands for the principle that the Mohawk Nation is not a subject of the Crown, but a co-sovereign pillar upon which the Canadian state itself rests.

The phrase “Crown Plus” reclaims the language of Canada’s political history — a response to the White Paper (1969) and Red Paper (1970) — and reframes it in the Mohawk context. Where others spoke of “citizens plus,” we assert “Crown Plus”: the indivisible bond of alliance, honour, and hereditary right between the Mohawk and the Crown.

Part I — The Legal Foundations and Historical Continuity

Explores the origins of the Haldimand Proclamation, the Dorchester correction, the Mohawk–Crown alliance since Queen Anne, and the constitutional distinctiveness of the Mohawk Loyalist posterity.

Part II — Modern Violations, Fiduciary Duties, and Institutional Responsibility

Documents the breach of fiduciary duty by Crown agents, the propagation of false land acknowledgements, and the complicity of academic, corporate, and judicial institutions in sustaining unlawful occupation.

Part III — Framework for Restoration, Recommendations, and the Path Forward

Outlines a ten-year restoration plan, proposes the Mohawk Posterity Registry and Royal Commission of Continuity, and reaffirms the spiritual and legal covenant through the Crown Plus Initiative.