Six Miles Deep

Consent vs. Consultation

Home » Lexicon » Consent vs. Consultation

Consultation and consent are often presented as two ends of a spectrum. Under Canadian law, the duty to consult requires governments to notify Indigenous peoples of proposed decisions that may affect their rights, to share information, to listen, and to attempt to minimize harms. But consultation does not always give communities a veto; governments sometimes proceed over clear objections.

Consent implies a stronger standard: certain decisions should not lawfully go ahead without a clear “yes” from those whose rights are at stake. In the Haldimand setting, the language of “safe and comfortable retreat” and “posterity forever” suggests that the Crown’s commitments go beyond minimal procedural courtesy. The question becomes whether development, taxation, and jurisdiction can legitimately proceed on these lands without the informed, collective consent of the Mohawk posterity to whom they were granted.

134 words

Sign up to the Newsletter!
Get the latest articles and news delivered to your mailbox.

Categories


About Benjamin Doolittle U.E.

listen to BLOODLINE

“Bloodline” follows the Haldimand Proclamation from its original promise to the present fight to have it honoured. The track moves through Crown grants, broken commitments, and the legal and political road back to enforcement, asking listeners to hear the Proclamation not as a relic of the past, but as a living obligation that still binds the Crown to the Mohawk Nation of Grand River.

Artist: One Way Current
Writer: Benjamin Doolittle UE
Producer: One Way Current
Publisher: Corn Press Publications
Affiliation: Six Miles Deep / Mohawk Nation of Grand River

Six Miles Deep