Entail / Tailzie (Comparative)

Home » Lexicon » Entail / Tailzie (Comparative)

Entail (in English law) and tailzie (in Scottish law) were systems of hereditary landholding designed to keep estates within a family line by restricting the ability to sell, divide, or mortgage the land. They often followed strict rules about who could inherit, usually favouring the eldest male heir and limiting the freedom of current holders.

These concepts are used in the Haldimand conversation primarily as analogies. They help non-lawyers understand how a grant can be structured to protect a family or group’s long-term interest in land across generations. However, Mohawk and Loyalist contexts are different: Haldimand’s grant speaks of a nation and “posterity forever,” and Dorchester’s U.E. rule allows descent “by either sex.” So while entail and tailzie offer useful comparison points, the Haldimand framework has its own logic and must be understood on its own terms.


In Scots law, tailzie (/ˈtli/) is a feudal concept of the inheritance of immovable property according to an arbitrary course that has been laid out, such as in a document known as a “deed of tailzie”. It was codified by the Entail Act 1685.

Tailzie is similar to the common law concept of fee tail, as the “heir in tailzie” is entailed to the property. An “heir in tailzie” could not sell the property so inherited, except to the feu superior (that is, to the holder of the dominum directum of the feu).

The Entail Amendment Act 1848 gave all heirs in tailzie power to apply to the Court of Session to cease the deed of tailzie, compensate respective claims, thus take estate possession in fee simple. Part 5 of the Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000 disentailed all entailed land in Scotland and required the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland to close the Register of Entails.

Sc. Law: an entail, the settlement of heritable property inalienably on a specified line of heirs, not heirs at law, a practice modified by various statutes since 1685 and finally made incompetent after 1914. The form tailyie became obsol. in the mid. 18th c., the corresponding Eng. entail being substituted, and is now only in arch. use. The law books favour the spelling tailzie. Hence heir of tailyie, an heir succeeding under and enjoying rights limited by an entail. https://dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/tailyie

352 words

Sign up to the Newsletter!
Get the latest articles and news delivered to your mailbox.

Categories


About Benjamin Doolittle U.E.

listen to BLOODLINE

“Bloodline” follows the Haldimand Proclamation from its original promise to the present fight to have it honoured. The track moves through Crown grants, broken commitments, and the legal and political road back to enforcement, asking listeners to hear the Proclamation not as a relic of the past, but as a living obligation that still binds the Crown to the Mohawk Nation of Grand River.

Artist: One Way Current
Writer: Benjamin Doolittle UE
Producer: One Way Current
Publisher: Corn Press Publications
Affiliation: Six Miles Deep / Mohawk Nation of Grand River

WHITE PAPER

CROWN PLUS

Crown Plus is an initiative of the Mohawk University, dedicated to restoring truth, lawful continuity, and honour in the interpretation and application of the Haldimand Proclamation of 1784 — the foundational covenant between the Mohawk Nation and the British Crown.

This paper is divided into three parts, each exploring a distinct dimension of the Haldimand covenant: its legal origins, its modern violations, and the path toward lawful restoration. Together, they form the living record of a truth that has been long buried beneath colonial misinterpretation.Crown Plus stands for the principle that the Mohawk Nation is not a subject of the Crown, but a co-sovereign pillar upon which the Canadian state itself rests.

The phrase “Crown Plus” reclaims the language of Canada’s political history — a response to the White Paper (1969) and Red Paper (1970) — and reframes it in the Mohawk context. Where others spoke of “citizens plus,” we assert “Crown Plus”: the indivisible bond of alliance, honour, and hereditary right between the Mohawk and the Crown.

Part I — The Legal Foundations and Historical Continuity

Explores the origins of the Haldimand Proclamation, the Dorchester correction, the Mohawk–Crown alliance since Queen Anne, and the constitutional distinctiveness of the Mohawk Loyalist posterity.

Part II — Modern Violations, Fiduciary Duties, and Institutional Responsibility

Documents the breach of fiduciary duty by Crown agents, the propagation of false land acknowledgements, and the complicity of academic, corporate, and judicial institutions in sustaining unlawful occupation.

Part III — Framework for Restoration, Recommendations, and the Path Forward

Outlines a ten-year restoration plan, proposes the Mohawk Posterity Registry and Royal Commission of Continuity, and reaffirms the spiritual and legal covenant through the Crown Plus Initiative.