Six Miles Deep

Reconciliation vs. Restitution

Home » Lexicon » Reconciliation vs. Restitution

Reconciliation is often presented in Canadian politics as a process of healing relationships, offering apologies, and building better partnerships. It is important work, but on its own it can remain largely symbolic. Restitution, by contrast, is about actually returning, repairing, or compensating for specific losses—land, resources, jurisdiction, or opportunities.

On the Haldimand Tract, reconciliation talk that leaves land, jurisdiction, and hereditary rights untouched is thin. The Six Miles Deep approach insists on restitution: recognizing Mohawk Loyalist posterity, re-aligning taxation and governance, returning certain lands or creating robust shared jurisdiction, and building concrete fiduciary structures that respond to Haldimand’s “posterity forever” promise. Reconciliation without restitution risks becoming a story Canada tells itself to feel better while leaving the structural theft in place.

122 words

Sign up to the Newsletter!
Get the latest articles and news delivered to your mailbox.

Categories


About Benjamin Doolittle U.E.

listen to BLOODLINE

“Bloodline” follows the Haldimand Proclamation from its original promise to the present fight to have it honoured. The track moves through Crown grants, broken commitments, and the legal and political road back to enforcement, asking listeners to hear the Proclamation not as a relic of the past, but as a living obligation that still binds the Crown to the Mohawk Nation of Grand River.

Artist: One Way Current
Writer: Benjamin Doolittle UE
Producer: One Way Current
Publisher: Corn Press Publications
Affiliation: Six Miles Deep / Mohawk Nation of Grand River

Six Miles Deep