Taxation Without Clear Jurisdiction

Home » Lexicon » Taxation Without Clear Jurisdiction

Taxation without clear jurisdiction happens when a government levies taxes on land or activity even though its legal authority over that territory is uncertain, contested, or never properly obtained. Historically, people have used the phrase “taxation without representation” to protest being taxed by a government they did not elect or have a voice in. On Haldimand lands, both problems show up at once—but the deeper issue is taxation without lawful jurisdiction.

Municipalities and provinces collect property, income, and sales taxes on the Grand River as if their authority were self-evident. Residents are expected to pay, vote in municipal or provincial elections, and accept “representation” in those systems. But if the underlying land was already granted as a protected refuge for the Mohawk Nation and their posterity “forever,” and if no clear transfer of jurisdiction was ever made to those municipalities or provinces with the informed consent of that posterity, then every tax bill carries a constitutional question mark.

In that sense, Mohawk Loyalist families experience a double distortion:

  • Taxation without representation in their own constitutional order – Mohawk laws, councils, and clan structures have no recognized seat in the tax system that drains value from their lands.

  • Taxation without clear jurisdiction by outside governments – Canadian institutions act as if they hold full title and sovereign authority, even though the Crown’s own record (Haldimand, Dorchester, Simcoe, and committee minutes) shows that these lands were already spoken for.

Six Miles Deep uses this term to highlight that tax systems built on shaky constitutional foundations are not neutral. Every municipal levy, provincial assessment, and enforcement action on Six Miles Deep is a daily expression of unresolved Crown breach: money is being taken out of a promised “safe and comfortable retreat” without first answering the basic question, “By what authority?”

296 words

Sign up to the Newsletter!
Get the latest articles and news delivered to your mailbox.

Categories


About Benjamin Doolittle U.E.

listen to BLOODLINE

“Bloodline” follows the Haldimand Proclamation from its original promise to the present fight to have it honoured. The track moves through Crown grants, broken commitments, and the legal and political road back to enforcement, asking listeners to hear the Proclamation not as a relic of the past, but as a living obligation that still binds the Crown to the Mohawk Nation of Grand River.

Artist: One Way Current
Writer: Benjamin Doolittle UE
Producer: One Way Current
Publisher: Corn Press Publications
Affiliation: Six Miles Deep / Mohawk Nation of Grand River

WHITE PAPER

CROWN PLUS

Crown Plus is an initiative of the Mohawk University, dedicated to restoring truth, lawful continuity, and honour in the interpretation and application of the Haldimand Proclamation of 1784 — the foundational covenant between the Mohawk Nation and the British Crown.

This paper is divided into three parts, each exploring a distinct dimension of the Haldimand covenant: its legal origins, its modern violations, and the path toward lawful restoration. Together, they form the living record of a truth that has been long buried beneath colonial misinterpretation.Crown Plus stands for the principle that the Mohawk Nation is not a subject of the Crown, but a co-sovereign pillar upon which the Canadian state itself rests.

The phrase “Crown Plus” reclaims the language of Canada’s political history — a response to the White Paper (1969) and Red Paper (1970) — and reframes it in the Mohawk context. Where others spoke of “citizens plus,” we assert “Crown Plus”: the indivisible bond of alliance, honour, and hereditary right between the Mohawk and the Crown.

Part I — The Legal Foundations and Historical Continuity

Explores the origins of the Haldimand Proclamation, the Dorchester correction, the Mohawk–Crown alliance since Queen Anne, and the constitutional distinctiveness of the Mohawk Loyalist posterity.

Part II — Modern Violations, Fiduciary Duties, and Institutional Responsibility

Documents the breach of fiduciary duty by Crown agents, the propagation of false land acknowledgements, and the complicity of academic, corporate, and judicial institutions in sustaining unlawful occupation.

Part III — Framework for Restoration, Recommendations, and the Path Forward

Outlines a ten-year restoration plan, proposes the Mohawk Posterity Registry and Royal Commission of Continuity, and reaffirms the spiritual and legal covenant through the Crown Plus Initiative.