Six Miles Deep

Trust vs. Refuge

Home » Lexicon » Trust vs. Refuge

Trust vs. refuge” contrasts two very different ways of structuring land. Indian Act lands are often described as “held in trust” by the Crown for a band, with heavy federal control. Haldimand lands, by contrast, were purchased by the Crown and then set apart as a “safe and comfortable retreat” under His protection for Mohawk allies and their posterity. That looks less like a narrow trust estate and more like a constitutional refuge zone.

The Six Miles Deep framework argues that Haldimand lands should not be squeezed into the Indian Act trust model. They were never meant to be “just another reserve.” They were meant to be a shielded homeland, where Mohawk law and Loyalist posterity could flourish without constant external interference. Treating the Tract as a trust parcel managed under the Indian Act erases that distinction and downgrades a refuge into a program. “Trust vs. refuge” keeps that difference visible and insists that remedies match the original vision.

159 words

Sign up to the Newsletter!
Get the latest articles and news delivered to your mailbox.

Categories


About Benjamin Doolittle U.E.

listen to BLOODLINE

“Bloodline” follows the Haldimand Proclamation from its original promise to the present fight to have it honoured. The track moves through Crown grants, broken commitments, and the legal and political road back to enforcement, asking listeners to hear the Proclamation not as a relic of the past, but as a living obligation that still binds the Crown to the Mohawk Nation of Grand River.

Artist: One Way Current
Writer: Benjamin Doolittle UE
Producer: One Way Current
Publisher: Corn Press Publications
Affiliation: Six Miles Deep / Mohawk Nation of Grand River

Six Miles Deep